TeddyBite claims nothing that is not listed here. Every figure on the product page leads to this overview: who collected it, when, with how many respondents — and how solid it is. Weak evidence is marked as weak, not hidden.
39sources in total
15official statistic or guideline
11peer-reviewed study
13secondary or vendor source
What the three levels mean
Official
Authority, ministry, national guideline or a manufacturer documenting its own product. The most solid level.
Study
Peer-reviewed literature — randomised trials, meta-analyses, reviews. Method and sample are disclosed.
Secondary
Market research, industry report, press coverage or vendor data. Often useful, rarely representative — and sometimes without a published sample.
Filter by evidence level
Filter by independence
Why a suggestion helps
The hurdle is not the cooking. It is the decision before it.
Secondary
68 %
say that deciding what to eat is their biggest hurdle of the day.
Publisher
Factor / Wakefield Research
Collected
10.–16.12.2024
Sample
1,000 nationally representative adults, USA
checked on
11.09.2026
Own interestFactor, the commissioning party, is a ready-meal delivery service owned by HelloFresh since 2020. A result showing meal planning as a burden serves the business.
Each region has its own guideline and its own starting point.
Official
1,2–1,6 g
of protein per kilogram of body weight per day is the new US guideline — up from 0.8 g. For the first time, highly processed foods are named explicitly.
Publisher
US-Ernährungsleitlinien 2025–2030 (HHS / USDA)
Collected
07.01.2026
Sample
official guideline, not a survey
checked on
04.09.2026
IndependentNo discernible interest in the outcome: authority, learned society or peer-reviewed research.
Quiet notifications, no leaderboards, and what the subscription business says.
Study
59
studies on nutrition apps were reviewed. Most common engagement tools: notifications (49 %), personalisation (32 %), goals (31 %). Only 31 % of the papers define engagement at all.
Publisher
Vasiloglou et al., JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Collected
2026
Sample
scoping review
checked on
04.09.2026
IndependentNo discernible interest in the outcome: authority, learned society or peer-reviewed research.
Counter-evidence and refuted figures — these belong here too.
Study
widerlegt
is the most famous figure in this field: the “226 food decisions a day”. It arose from a counting artefact (sub-questions add up higher than the overall question). The researchers warn explicitly that such figures can undermine people’s belief in themselves.
Publisher
Claassen, Hertwig, Mata — Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, in „Appetite"
Collected
2025
Sample
methodological critique of the 2007 original study. TeddyBite therefore does not use this figure.
checked on
11.09.2026
IndependentNo discernible interest in the outcome: authority, learned society or peer-reviewed research.
papers by the best-known researcher on food decisions were retracted; the university found research misconduct. Many popular figures on eating behaviour come from that circle — none of them appears on this page.
Publisher
Cornell University / Retraction Watch
Collected
2018–2022
Sample
included as a warning, not as evidence for a product feature
checked on
11.09.2026
IndependentNo discernible interest in the outcome: authority, learned society or peer-reviewed research.
of users abandon lifestyle and health apps within 100 days (median). That is the hardest number against this project — and the reason TeddyBite works without any logging.
Publisher
Kidman, Curtis, Watson, Maher — Journal of Medical Internet Research
Collected
2024
Sample
scoping review of 18 studies with 525,824 participants
checked on
11.09.2026
IndependentNo discernible interest in the outcome: authority, learned society or peer-reviewed research.
was the gain of an app with reminders, medals and motivational messages over a plain recipe app: 6.67 % versus 5.41 % weight loss, no statistical difference. That is exactly why TeddyBite has no badges and no leaderboard.
Publisher
Brindal, Hendrie, Freyne, Noakes — JMIR mHealth and uHealth
is the day Mealime shuts down — an established meal-planning app. Yummly was discontinued in December 2024. Standalone recipe apps rarely carry themselves.
Publisher
Mealime (Betreiberangabe auf der eigenen Seite)
Collected
abgerufen 11.09.2026
Sample
operator announcement, read in the original
checked on
11.09.2026
IndependentNo discernible interest in the outcome: authority, learned society or peer-reviewed research.
is what happened to the replication of “willpower that depletes” — 23 labs, 2,141 participants, no measurable effect. Important distinction: that people report the food question as a burden is a self-report and stands. The claimed mechanism behind it does not.
Publisher
Hagger et al., Perspectives on Psychological Science; Vohs et al.
Every source was opened on the date given and read in the original wherever it was accessible. Where only a summary was available, that is stated under the sample. If a figure falls away or is refuted, it disappears here and on the product page at the same time.